http://www.dinsdoc.com/bruce-1-11.htm
Bruce, Economic History of Virginia in the Seventeenth Century. Ch. XI
(DB) Quoted the above here for study, and to further the discussion, as well as for better understanding of the issues. Our thanks to "Bruce" for all his hard work! I'm just a "name-collector, not a Geno by any stretch of the imagination. I am not truly disparaging any Geno or their work, only through study and asking questions can we learn. I just think learn'n don't gott'a be bore'in!
(DB) Here it is! The truth and lies of the "First Slave" in America....If you can carefully read and understand the subject; and lies separated from truths, amidst all the blood dripping between the lines. You can almost hear the Ghosts speaking through time...to your heart. Screaming for understanding, as they were only human. As are we.
(DB) THE LIE...BUT NOT BY "Bruce, Economic History of Virginia..."
"In 1619, at the moment when the settlers were beginning to feel the first beneficent effects of a milder government, twenty Africans were disembarked from a Dutch privateer, presumably at Jamestown, as the place where a market was most readily found for a cargo of laborers. The ill-fated vessel, which was destined to earn by this single act in its career a sinister immortality in history, was sailing under letters of marque from the Prince of Orange and had been cruising in the Spanish Main for the purpose of capturing Spanish prizes."
(DB) SPOILING THE PLANS OF MICE AND MEN! The conspirator flees.
"Yeardley in the meanwhile having taken the place of Argoll, who had a few days before the arrival of the new Governor returned by stealth to England. The "Treasurer"(DB An English ship) arrived in Virginia in the course of the same summer as the Dutch privateer, but, meeting with a cold reception, she turned back to the Bermudas, carrying with her a number of slaves, who were placed upon the lands which the Earl of Warwick owned in that island. During her stay in the Colony, she seems to have disembarked only one negro, so far as the records shows."
(DB) What? only one negro? Not "TWENTY some odd"? Maybe we know his name! John Punch?
"It has been suggested that the first negroes introduced into Virginia after its occupation by the English were imported in the "Treasurer," and not in the Dutch privateers. All the evidence which has been published goes to confirm the statement of Rolfe,..."
(DB) "into Virginia after its occupation by the English were" Lots of other people of other Nations had started a colonial settlement, even close, if not upon the exact same spot as James City.
"See Census 1624-25, Hotten’s Original List of Emigrants, 1600-1700, p. 224. The name of this negro, who was a woman, was Angela."
(DB) What? A woman? Maybe she was prego?
"In the space of five years immediately following 1619, the number of Africans in the Colony was increased by two."
(DB) Ah Ha! So; she mighta had twins!
"The muster taken of the population in 1624-25 discloses the presence of twenty-two as compared with the twenty brought in by the Dutch privateer, but one of these two additions is accounted for by the fact that the "Treasurer" had landed a negro in Virginia in 1619, and the other had been imported in the "Swan" in 1623. The two children included in the lists of the muster, it may be, were born on the North American continent."
(DB) Mmmm,...This is beginning to sound awfully familiar..."perhaps one was hatched at sea, inside the, as yet to be marked "Territorial boundaries" then marked as "born in the continental...."
"...if over five years, they were born at sea or in the West Indies. While the mind cannot contemplate the birth of the first negro on North American soil with the same emotions as those aroused by the birth of Virginia Dare, the event nevertheless was one which cannot be regarded without a feeling of the profoundest interest when we reflect upon its association with the great events which were to come after. Whichever of these children, if either, was born in Virginia, it was the first of his race who could claim a nativity in the soil and an absolute identification with its history."
(DB) Amazing to contemplate, ain't it?
"It is an interesting fact that no African perished in the massacre of 1622, when three hundred and forty-five of the colonists fell by the tomahawks and arrows of the Indians."
(DB) And no births for five years after the first import!
"Their failure to increase in number during the five years immediately...""Five years after the census of 1624-25 was taken, from which it appears that there were twenty-two Africans in the Colony at that time, an important addition was made to the slave population by Captain Grey, who, during a cruise in the ship "Fortune" of London had encountered a vessel loaded with negroes from the Angola coast, captured her and brought her cargo into Virginia. This cargo he exchanged there for eighty-five hogsheads and five butts of tobacco, which were afterwards transported to England for sale. It would seem that no difficulty was found in disposing of these slaves, although they were rude savages stolen only a few weeks before from their native country. The demand for labor was now so urgent that these untrained barbarians were doubtless purchased in haste."
(DB) It is meant, as opposed to "Christ-en-ized" negros, with previ-ou-se employment in the skilled art of enslavement. The Dutch brought negros that attended Church every Sunday? And were "trained", probably by the whip?
"As has been seen in connection with the "Treasurer", which, if not the property of the Company, was owned by its leading members, the restriction to this coast was not strictly observed in its operation."
(DB) By "Company", he means the investors and thus "owners" in the enterprise of starting a Colony in the "New World". Yeah, Virginia...James Citty...Making money, and eventually putting the Colonists into DEBT to the Company investors, Dub-bull-lee! While quoted by all the history books as having tried to make a buck, and having failed, that is, until "High-Grade" tobacco was established by Rolf. "Established" due to the fact that the NA had a type of the stinkweed long before England was a country!
(DB) Debt in tobacco arriz-ing from Bills to purchase the new incoming "cargo". Shure messes up the narrative, timeline, and the "First Slave in America" theory. seems to me. (Confession due to my conflict: Yea, I was a user; In fact, a "five-pack-a-day man fer a year or two! Also, please notice my surname, if ya ain't already:)
"The Spaniards are said to have occupied Jamestown Island in the previous century and to have sought to make a permanent settlement there, partly by means of the labors of their negro slaves."
(DB) I remember an "Hog Island", but no Jamestown Island? It were a swamp, actually? Spaniards had negro slaves in this land, in the same place Jamestown was later established. Did they leave any? Did any escape? Wadda-you think?
(DB) Why does all of this matter today? I mean after all these years? Because, as a reader and student of History, I know that what has happened may/will happen again! And as my direct kin built the Hope Mansion, it is of great interest to me. Here is a bit of an important history you should read.
https://ncgenweb.us/bertie/indianwoodslostreservation.html
"A LOST RESERVATION by GERALD W. THOMA © 2017
"In April 2017, Dr. Larry E. Tise, Department of History, East Carolina University, contacted me regarding my interest in being a presenter at a conference to be held at Hope Plantation, Windsor, North Carolina, in October 2017, on the history of the Indian Woods reservation."
"English colonists held a disdainful, prejudiced, and discriminatory attitude toward Indians, including mixed-blood persons. Indians were not given the same rights and privileges in colonial North Carolina as those available to citizens of English descent. The Native Americans were largely excluded from English society and were statutorily not allowed to vote. North Carolina law also stipulated that “Indians, Mulattoes, and all mixed Blood, descended from … Indian Ancestors to the Third Generation, Bond or Free, shall be deemed and taken to be incapable in Law to be Witnesses in any Cause whatsoever, except against each other.” In other words, Indians had virtually no legal rights in the eyes of the colony’s judicial system. Equally discriminatory were additional laws related to mixed-blood relationships and the children (mulattoes, quadroons, mustees (octoroons or, more generally, people of mixed ancestry), etc.) born therefrom. Colonial legislators had enacted laws “for Prevention of that abominable Mixture and spurious issue” of white persons intermarrying with “Indians, … Mustees, or Mulattoes.” Laws stipulated that any “white Man or Woman, being free,” who intermarried “with an Indian, … Mustee, or Mulatto . . . or any Person of Mixed Blood, to the Third Generation, bond or free,” was required to pay a sizeable fine to the county in which he or she resided. Personal relationships between whites and any minorities, including mixed-blood individuals, were strongly condemned from a societal point of view.28"
(DB) But what do I know? I'm just a "name-collector, asking questions.
Dan Bunch
Later,TEXAS
